SHORTHAND REPORTERS
ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA
BUSINESS PLAN
1.
HISTORY
1.1
It was proposed at the SRAA Annual General Meeting at Perth held on
Saturday 26 February 2000 that a business plan should be developed for the
Association.
2
PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS
2.1
The business plan must reflect the objects as defined in the
Constitution and Rules.
2.2
The business plan must be achievable in terms of the limited human and
financial resources of a small organisation.
3
IMPLEMENTATION
3.1
Although paragraph 34 of the Constitution and Rules refers to
"Alteration of Objects and Rules" nowhere are Objects and Rules
defined. Therefore the most immediate
requirement is drafting and adopting in the Constitution objects which,
pursuant to paragraph 34, can be "added to only by a special resolution of
the association".
3.2
Cognisant of the need for an achievable business plan, it is therefore
recommended that by way of special resolution at the February AGM, which
requires pursuant to 23(2) notice in writing "at least 21 days before the
date fixed for the holding of the general meeting", the following changes
to the Constitution and Rules be considered:
(a) that
"PRELIMINARY" under "PART I" be amended to read:
"OBJECTS
1.
(1) The objects of the Shorthand
Reporters Association of Australia Inc (SRAA) are to advance and promote the
professions of court reporting, parliamentary reporting and
stenocaptioning.
(b) that under
"INTERPRETATION" the current paragraphs 1(1) to 1(3) be renumbered
1(2) to 1(4).
3.3
The proposed objects and the attached "Draft Business Plan" be
advised in writing to all members prior to the AGM to be discussed and adopted
as amended.
DRAFT BUSINESS PLAN
1 THE OBJECTS OF THE PLAN
ARE:
1.1.
To advance, market and promote our profession in the changing world of
court and Hansard reporting and stenocaptioning;
1.2.
To recognise and identify areas of concern such as recruitment and
education, professional development, competing technologies and financial
viability;
1.3.
To recognise and define where possible the changes that are likely to
occur to the roles of court reporters, Hansard reporters and stenocaptioners
given the introduction of new technologies; and
1.4.
To recommend appropriate remedial action and/or policies and to
formulate time frames for their implementation.
2.
MARKETING, PROMOTION AND ADVERTISING.
2.1
The promotion, marketing and advertising of the reporting profession to
students, reporters and managers, (particularly the decision and/or policy
makers who employ reporters), clients, be they the courts, the legal
profession, parliaments, the television industry, corporations or the public,
by:-
(a)
further development and enhancement of the SRAA website, including
having its own strategy plan, eg, a court reporters forum; continuation of
present policies of free listing of job vacancies; the introduction of
advertising where advertisers have a link to their own home page; and a page
for goods for sale such as used steno machines, etc;
(b) further development
and enhancement of the SRAA's magazine with greater distribution to judges,
parliamentarians, the legal profession, decision and policy makers, et cetera;
and increased revenue through advertising;
(c) greater distribution
of the SRAA brochure to schools and clients;
(d) continuation and
increased promotion of SRAA conferences to other industry
organisations and bodies; and
(e) pro bono or CART
services for the hearing impaired.
3.
RECOGNITION OF AREAS OF CONCERN
3.1
In terms of identifying areas of concern there should be an initial (and
then perhaps biennial) census of:-
CURRENT COURT REPORTERS, HANSARD REPORTERS
AND STENOCAPTIONERS
(a) reporters - the number
of court reporters, Hansard reporters, stenocaptioners and trainees in each
State and Territory, including an age profile;
(b) reporting organisations - the number of reporters, typists and
monitors within court reporting and sound recording agencies, both public and
private, and similarly Hansards and stenocaptioning entities.
JOB VACANCIES PROFILE:
Vacancies and associated job descriptions
and any information on proposed changes within organisations which will impact
on reporter staffing levels.
PROFILE OF COURT REPORTING SCHOOLS:
A profile of every private school of court
reporting, Sydney TAFE and the National
College of Court Reporting in Adelaide,
detailing:
- courses offered, whether full time, part
time or correspondence;
- qualifications awarded;
- qualification of teachers;
- number of students presently enrolled;
- a student results profile detailing the
percentage drop-out rate in each classification of part time, full time and
correspondence, together with the number
of successful graduates in 1999, 2000 and
2001 and the total since commencement of
the school to date;
- theory taught, together with details of
other subjects or modules such as English,
parliamentary procedures, court reporting,
et cetera;
- general considerations such as whether
the school has a classroom or office configuration, the number and type of
shorthand machines and computers, the CAT software used, class capacities,
estimated 2002 year-end graduates; and,
- finally, advertising expenditure for
1999, 2000, 2001 and to date.
3.2
A committee member in each State should identify through discussion with
clients, reporters and management changes which have resulted from or will
result from the introduction of new technologies or other factors likely to
impact on the role of reporters, in order for the committee to recommend
action.
(Members have already suggested the following:
Competition from sound recording.
(a) public sector.
Is it a threat or simply a necessity to
enable management flexibility in order to provide coverage to a wide range of
courts and tribunals; for Hansard management, is it a necessary tool, for
example, to enable reporters to have meal breaks or indeed allow them to go
home during lengthy sittings?
Does it make sense for a reporter to
provide transcript services in a jurisdiction where a transcript is not
required?
(b) private sector.
Is it only a threat when it is used to
provide daily transcripts or again are there simply insufficient court
reporters?
Voice recognition - claimed to be three to
five years away (FTR) from providing multivoice realtime applications in courts
and parliaments.
Although perceived as a threat, voice
recognition is used successfully by Hansard staffs in Western Australia, NSW
and Victoria, and has been trialled by Canberra Hansard and the Reporting
Services Branch in New South Wales.
What is our best educated guess as to when
multivoice realtime applications will succeed?
Digital sound recording - because of the
current conversion to digital television and digital mobile telephones, it is
perceived by decision makers as being more flexible and efficient as it has a
"buzz word" status and as such is self-promoting. There is a lack of argument countering any
increased efficiency of digital sound recording and, for example, no promotion
of the fact that Case CATalyst itself has digital sound recording.
Are reporters too slow to adopt
technologies? For example, it is now 15
years since the introduction of realtime.
Do reporters offer enough value-added
services?
Is there insufficient knowledge of
technological trends and new technologies and how they can be adopted by
reporters to provide additional services?
4.
Once defined, areas of concern can be addressed, but some that have
already been suggested are:
- the successful continuance, however
changed, of reporting as a profession;
- the identification of technologies and
value-added services that aid reporters to promote their profession;
- a more timely recognition and analysis
of technologies that both assist and threaten reporters;
- the identification and development of
career opportunities;
- the improved education and training of
current and future reporters and managers;
- the need for a continual review of
SRAA's objects and operations, particularly ongoing financial reviews with the
aim of identifying any scope for increased revenue, not necessarily increased
conference fees and membership fees but perhaps sponsorship and advertising
revenue (the web site and SRAA magazine);
- the need to identify and liaise with
other organisations such as NCRA, CRPSA, ALSM, Council of Chief Justices, the
Australian Judicial Review Committee, national transcript committees and E-law
international transcript committees, et cetera; and
- the need to review any requirement for a
code of ethics for reporters, private or public, such as exists in the NCRA or
even the Court Reporters (Private Sector) Association (CRPSA) in
Australia.